A high degree of suspicion for vascular injury (traumatic aneurysms, arteriovenous fistula, venous injury) should accompany all patients who present with pTBI. Most specifically, those with penetration through areas of high vascular concentration (trans-orbital, pterional, bi-hemispheric, posterior fossa), violation of multiple dural compartments, and intracerebral hematoma are considered highest risk for vascular injury (Section VI-7, Neurovascular Imaging). With this in mind, investigation to rule out CV injury should be performed in all patients with penetrating brain injury (Section VI-7, Neurovascular Imaging; Section VII-6 Open and Endovascular Management of Traumatic Vascular Injury)
Following initial screening, it is the presence or absence of traumatic vascular injury, specifically traumatic aneurysms, their size, and their location that should influence further surgical decision making. In general, small, distal (M4, A4) traumatic aneurysms may be addressed during surgical exposure for decompression, and will almost always include sacrifice of the associated artery. Smaller, proximal traumatic aneurysms may not rupture upon opening, and may be possible to address endovascularly in a delayed fashion.
The most concerning circumstance involves the formation of a large, skull base traumatic aneurysm (ICA, M1 MCA, A1 ACA, vertebrobasilar) associated with severe cerebral injury requiring urgent decompression. What is the most appropriate course of action? Should the aneurysm be addressed first followed by decompression, or vice versa. Concerning the traumatic aneurysm, it must be remembered that these are not true saccular aneurysms. They are most often circulating blood encapsulated by coagulum. Open surgical approaches to these injuries are significantly hampered by anatomic disruption from the penetrating injury trajectory, cerebral swelling and edema, and hematoma. If immediate surgical decompression is considered necessary in the non-medically futile patient, the surgeon should expect and prepare for immediate and brisk arterial bleeding with opening. Adequate and running supply of blood products should be present in the room. Aneurysm clips, emergency suction, and a competent assistant should be present. A cerebrovascular subspecialized neurosurgeon may be very valuable in such a case if available. Neck preparation and exposure for proximal control may be necessary. The surgeon should also prepare to sacrifice the injured artery given reconstruction options are unlikely to be successful in this setting. Surgical bypass may be possible in this setting if performed by a highly experienced surgeon with assistance. Alternatively, strong consideration for endovascular management in this situation should be entertained. It may be possible to provide some protection by endovascular means, but at the cost of delaying cranial decompression. Overall, the decision in this "worst case scenario" remains the responsibility of the operative surgeon, and should be accompanied by rapid, thoughtful preparation with either chosen course of action.
In general, it is possible to treat traumatic aneurysms using endovascular techniques. Coil occlusion of traumatic aneurysms is possible, and should be entertained if considered appropriate
Should vascular injury be diagnosed and treated, a follow up cerebral angiogram 7-21 days after the aneurysm is diagnosed and treated, is recommended.
High Suspicion Injury: